Theoretical analysis of the coupling between Feshbach states and hyperfine excited states in the creation of 23Na40K molecule
Liu Ya-Xiong1, 2, Zhao Bo1, 2, †
Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
Shanghai Branch, CAS Center for Excellence and Synergetic Innovation Center in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Shanghai 201315, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: bozhao@ustc.edu.cn

Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0306502), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11521063 and 11904355), and the Fund from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS).

Abstract

We present an intensive study of the coupling between different Feshbach states and the hyperfine levels of the excited states in the adiabatic creation of 23Na40K ground-state molecules. We use coupled-channel method to calculate the wave function of the Feshbach molecules, and give the short-range wave function of triplet component. The energies of the hyperfine excited states and the coupling strength between the Feshbach states and the hyperfine excited states are calculated. Our results can be used to prepare a specific hyperfine level of the rovibrational ground state to study the ultracold collisions involving molecules.

1. Introduction

Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP) is a coherent manipulation technique that allows robust population transfer between discrete quantum states.[1,2] The principle of STIRAP can be understood using a three-level system involving two ground states and one excited state. By coupling the two ground states with the excited state using a pump light and a Stokes light, respectively, and adiabatically controlling the Rabi frequencies in a counterintuitive way, the system can be transferred from one ground state to the other one without any losses. Recently, the STIRAP technique has been employed to prepare ultracold alkali-metal diatomic molecules in the rovibrational ground state.[310] To prepare the ultracold ground-state molecules, weakly bound Feshbach molecules are first created in an ultracold atomic gas in the vicinity of an atomic Feshbach resonance, and then are transferred to the ground state via a molecule excited state by the STIRAP. An illustration of the STIRAP in the 23Na40K system is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Illustration of the stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in the 23Na40K system. By choosing the different Feshbach states, the proper hyperfine levels of the excited states, and the laser polarizations, the various hyperfine level of the ground-state molecule can be populated.

The Feshbach molecule is a kind of long-range molecule, and the long-range wave function is simply determined by the large magnetically-tunable scattering length.[11] This kind of universal property has been employed to study the BEC–BCS crossover in degenerate fermion gases,[12] the dynamics of solitons and votices in Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC),[13,14] and the universal few-body physics.[15,16] However, to prepare the ground-state molecule, we need to understand the short-range wave function of the Feshbach molecule, since the excited state is a conventional rovibrational state of the excited electronic state, and thus the coupling between the Feshbach state and the excited state occurs at the short range.

In the 23Na40K system, there are various atomic Feshbach resonances that can be used to create Feshbach molecules.[17,18] The projection of the total angular momentum along the magnetic field and the short-range wave function of these Feshbach molecules are different. The electronic excited state is a combination of the singlet and triplet electronic states, and it has many hyperfine levels due to the coupling between the electron spin and the nuclear spins.[19,20] These rich energy level structures offer the opportunity to create different hyperfine levels of the ground state by choosing the proper hyperfine excited states, the polarization of the pump and Stokes lasers, and the different Feshbach states. In our recent work, we have prepared the molecules in several different hyperfine levels of the rovibrational ground state to study the atom–molecule Feshbach resonances.[10] Besides, it has been demonstrated that in the 23Na40K system, the interference between a desired resonant STIRAP via resonantly coupled hyperfine level of the excited state and an unexpected detuned STIRAP via other off-resonantly coupled hyperfine levels can induce the oscillation of the round-trip STIRAP efficiency and affect the purity of the hyperfine ground states.[21] Therefore, it is important to understand the coupling between the Feshbach states and different hyperfine levels of the excited states.

In this paper, we present a detailed theoretical study of the coupling between the Feshbach states and different hyperfine levels of the excited states in the 23Na40K system. We will consider the broad Feshbach resonances between |fNa,mfNa⟩ = |1,1⟩ and |fK,mfK⟩ = |9/2,mfK⟩ states with mfK = −9/2, −7/2, −5/2. For each spin combination, there are two broad atomic Feshbach resonances. We will calculate the short-range wave function of the Feshbach state, and calculate the coupling between these Feshbach states and the hyperfine levels of the excited state, which is a mixture of the electronic excited states B1 Π |v = 12, J = 1⟩ and c3Σ |v = 35, J = 1⟩. Our results can be used to prepare the molecules in various hyperfine levels of the rovibrational ground states.

2. Feshbach molecules

We first consider the s-wave Feshbach molecule in the vicinity of the Feshbach resonance between the |fNa,mfNa⟩ = |1,1⟩ and |fK,mfK⟩ = |9/2,mfK⟩ states. The Feshbach state is labelled by |1,1;9/2,mfK⟩. The binding energy and the wave function of the Feshbach molecule can be calculated using the Hamiltonian

The first term is the kinetic energy T = −(ħ2/2μ)(d2/dr2) with μ = mNamK/(mNa + mK) the reduced mass. The second term is the spin-exchanging interaction, where P0 = 1/4 − sNa · sK and P1 = 3/4+ sNa · sK are the singlet and triplet projection operators respectively with s being the electron spin. The Born–Oppenheimer potential V0(r) and V1(r) represent the interaction potentials of the singlet X1Σ and triplet a3Σ molecule states, respectively. The Born-Oppenheimer potentials can be approximately described by power expansions of r, and the analytic formula can be found in Refs. [18,22]. The hyperfine interaction Hhf can be described by
where aNa = 885.813 MHz and aK = −285.7308 MHz are the atomic hyperfine constants of the ground states and i denotes the nuclear spin. The last term is the Zeeman term
where gs = 2.0023 is the electron g-factor, giNa = −0.0008 and giK = 0.000176 are the nuclear g-factor of 23Na and 40K, respectively, and B is the magnetic field along the z direction.

The internal states can be expressed in terms of the uncoupled basis |msNa, msK, miNa, miK⟩. The Hamiltonian couples all the internal states with the same projection along the magnetic field MF = mfNa + mfK = msNa + msK + miNa + miK. For a given MF and B, we first diagonalize the hyperfine and Zeeman Hamiltonian Hhf + Hz to obtain the internal eigenstate |χi⟩ and the threshold energy of these channels. Expanding the wave function in terms of the new bases |ψF(r) ⟩ = ∑iψi(r)|χi⟩, we obtain the coupled-channel Schrödinger equation

Assuming the threshold of the lowest channel is , the eigenvalues of the Feshbach state can be expressed as , where Eb > 0 represents the binding energy of the Feshbach molecule. We numerically solve Eq. (4) by means of the renormalized Numerov method[23] to calculate the binding energy and the wave function of the Feshbach state.

The calculated wave function can be expanded in terms of the spin-coupled basis |σ⟩ = |S, MS, miNa, miK⟩ by a unitary transformation

where |σj⟩ represents the state that conserves the total projection of angular momentum MF = MS + miNa + miK. The wave function includes the singlet component with S = 0 and the triplet component with S = 1. In Fig. 2, we plot the spatial wave function of the Feshbach molecule at 104 Gs (1 Gs = 10−4 T) in the vicinity of the Feshbach resonance between |1,1⟩ and |9/2,−7/2⟩ at about 110 Gs. The calculated binding energy is about 63 kHz. The Feshbach molecule has a long range component and thus is open channel dominated.

Fig. 2. (a) The spatial wave function of the Feshbach state |1,1;9/2, −7/2⟩ at B = 104 Gs (1 Gs = 10−4 T). Each color curve represents the wave function in a certain basis |σj⟩. (b) The triplet component of the spatial wave function at the short range. The inset is the normalized short-range wave function , with the cut off length a0.

It can be easily seen that only several channels have the long-range components. For these channels, the long-range wave function can be expressed as

where is a cut-off length, and ψL(r) represents the common long-range wave function, and the coefficient is
Therefore, we may express the long-range part of the wave function as
As shown in Fig. 2(a), for the Feshbhach molecule |1,1;9/2, −7/2⟩, the long-range wave functions exist in 6 channels.

For the STIRAP transfer, the short-range wave function is important. The short-range wave function includes the contribution from the the singlet and triplet potentials. In most cases, the contribution from the singlet potential is negligibly small, and thus the wave function of the Feshbach molecule is dominated by the triplet component. That is the reason why we usually need to find an excited state which is a mixture of triplet and singlet electronic excited state to perform the STIRAP.

The short-range wave function of the triplet component can be written as

where is a cut-off length, and ψT(r) represents the common short-range wave function. The coefficient can be calculated by
Therefore, the short-range wave function of the Feshbach molecule can be expressed as

For the Feshbach state |1,1;9/2,−7/2⟩ at B = 104 Gs, we have plotted the short-range wave function and the normalized wave function in Fig. 2(b). The normalized wave function can be approximated by the highest vibrational state of the triplet potential. We have calculated the short-range coefficients for the Feshbach molecules in the vicinity of different Feshbach resonances. The results are shown in 1. The coefficients will be used to calculate the coupling between the Feshbach states and the hyperfine levels of the excited states. Since the triplet s-wave bound state has good quantum numbers N = 0, S = 1, and J = 1, in the following discussions, we use the molecule quantum numbers to represent the basis , and the short-range wave function of the Feshbach state can be described by

Table 1.

The coefficients of the short-range wave function for different Feshbach molecules |1,1;9/2,mf⟩ with mf = −9/2, −7/2, −5/2.

.
3. Excited states

The excited state used in the STIRAP transfer is a mixture of the singlet electronic excited state B1Π |v = 12, J = 1⟩ and the triplet electronic excited state c3Σ |v = 35, J = 1⟩, and thus the excited state can be written as a superposition state |ψe⟩ = |ψB1Π⟩ + |ψc3Σ ⟩, where |ψB1Π⟩ and |ψc3Σ⟩ represent the singlet and triplet excited states, respectively. The hyperfine level structures of the excited states have been discussed in Refs. [19,20].

The triplet component |ψc3Σ⟩ accounts for the coupling between the Feshbach state and the electronic excited state, since the short-range wave function of the Feshbach molecule is dominated by the triplet component. The state |ψc3Σ⟩ can be expanded in the basis |NSJ MJ miNamiK⟩ with N = 1, S = 1, and J = 1. The hyperfine and Zeeman interactions for the c3Σ state are described by

where MHz and MHz are the hyperfine constants of the molecular excited states.

The singlet component |ψB1Π⟩ is responsible for the coupling between the excited state and the ground state, since the ground molecule state is a singlet state. The |ψB1Π⟩ state can be expanded in the basis |JΩMJ miNa miK⟩ with J = 1 and Ω = 1. The B1Π state has negligible hyperfine interaction and the Zeeman interaction is diagonal. The diagonal matrix element is given by ⟨JΩMJ miNamiK| HB|JΩMJ miNamiK⟩ = μB MJ B/(J(J + 1)). The |NSJ MJ miNa miK⟩ state of c3Σ and the |JΩMJ miNa miK⟩ state of B1Π are mixed by the spin–orbit coupling with a coupling coefficient ξBc = 0.54899 cm−1. Therefore, the energy and the wave function of the hyperfine levels of the excited states are obtained by diagonalizing the coupled Hamiltonian

where I is the identity matrix of dimension (2J + 1)(2iNa + 1)(2iK + 1) = 108, and EB = 17 701.427 cm−1 and Ec = 17 701.074 cm−1 are the energies of the B1Π |v = 12, J = 1⟩ and c3Σ |v = 35, J = 1⟩ rovibrational states, respectively. The eigenstates contain two branches and the branch including more triplet components is employed to perform the STIRAP. The typical energy level structure of the hyperfine levels of the excited states is plotted in Fig. 3. Because is much smaller than , the quantum numbers F1 = J + iNa, mF1 and miK can be approximated as good quantum numbers. The hyperfine levels with the same F1 = J + iNa and mF1 are nearly degenerate. In Fig. 3, the hyperfine levels of the excited states are labelled by these quantum numbers.

Fig. 3. The energy level structures of the excited states. The quantum numbers F1 = J + iNa and mF1 are approximately good quantum numbers. Each solid line represents 9 nearly degenerate hyperfine states with the same F1 = J + iNa and mF1 but different miK.

The triplet component of the wave function of the hyperfine excited state can be expressed as

Therefore the coupling strength between the hyperfine excited state and the Feshbach state for a q-polarized pump light with q = 0, ± 1 can be calculated by

The energies of the hyperfine levels of the excited state, relative to a reference frequency of 17700.64 cm−1, and the relative coupling strength between the hyperfine excited states and the Feshbach states in the vicinity of different Feshbach resonances are listed in Table 2. For each Feshbach state with MF, three hyperfine levels of the excited states with the total projection can be coupled by choosing the polarization of the lasers. To perform the STIRAP, we can choose a resolvable hyperfine level of the excited state, which should have a strong coupling with the Feshbach state and should be well separated from neighbouring hyperfine excited states. The good candidates are the states with F1 ≈ 5/2, mF1 ≈ 5/2,…,−5/2, the states with F1 ≈ 3/2, mF1 ≈ −3/2, and the states with F1 ≈ 1/2, mF1 ≈ ± 1/2.

Table 2.

The energies of the hyperfine excited states Ee, relative to a reference frequency of 17700.64 cm−1, and the absolute value of the relative coupling strength |Ωef| between different Feshbach states and different hyperfine levels of the excited states. For each Feshbach state with the projection of the total angular momentum MF, the hyperfine levels of the excited states with can be coupled by the pump light.

.

The coupling between the excited state and the ground state can be easily calculated once the singlet component of the excited state is obtained. The ground state can be expressed as |NSJMJ miNamiK⟩ with N = S = J = MJ = 0. The singlet component accounts for the coupling between the excited state and the ground state, and it can be expressed as,

Therefore the coupling strength between the hyperfine level of the excited state and the ground state |ψg⟩ = |NSJMJ miNa miK⟩ for the q-polarized Stokes light with q = 0, ± 1 is described by
The hyperfine level of the ground state that can be populated in the STIRAP can be understood as follows. For a hyperfine level of the excited state with , the quantum number miK is approximately a good quantum number. Therefore, for a Stokes light with q polarization, the hyperfine level of the ground state that can be dominantly populated from this hyperfine excited state is the state.

4. Conclusion

In summary, we have presented an intensive investigation of the coupling between the Feshbach states and the hyperfine levels of the excited states in the adiabatic creation of the 23Na40K molecule. The 23Na40K ground state molecules have 36 hyperfine levels. By employing the different Feshbach molecules discussed in the present work, in principle we can address 21 hyperfine levels of the ground state by choosing the proper laser polarization and hyperfine levels of the excited states. This is more efficient and convenient than using the microwave pulses to prepare different hyperfine levels of the molecular ground states. This is because a microwave Raman π pulse or two resonant microwave π pulses can only change the projection of the nuclear spin miNa or miK by 1. This means many π pulses may be required if we prepare one hyperfine ground state by the STIRAP and use microwave pulses to transfer it to other hyperfine states. However, by choosing proper hyperfine excited states and laser polarizations, various hyperfine states can be populated by simply preforming the STIRAP. By preparing the different hyperfine levels of the molecule states, we can study the atom-molecule scattering resonances in different spin state combination, precisely change the number of open channels, and investigate the role of nuclear spins in the ultracold molecule collisions.

Reference
[1] Bergmann K Theuer H Shore W 1998 Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 1003
[2] Vitanov N V Rangelov A A Shore B W Bergmann K 2017 Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 015006
[3] Ni K K Ospelkaus S de Miranda M H G Péer A Neyenhuis B Zirbel J Kotochigova S Julienne P S Jin D S Ye J 2008 Science 322 231
[4] Molony P K Gregory P D Ji Z Lu B Köppinger M P Le Sueur C R Blackley C L Hutson J M Cornish S L 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 255301
[5] Takekoshi T Reichsöllner L Schindewolf A Hutson J M Le Sueur C R Dulieu O Ferlaino F Grimm R Nägerl H C 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 205301
[6] Park J W Will S A Zwierlein M W 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 205302
[7] Guo M Zhu B Lu B Ye X Wang F Vexiau R Bouloufa-Maafa N Quéméner G Dulieu O Wang D 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 205303
[8] Rvachov T M Son H Sommer A T Ebadi S Park J J Zwierlein M W Ketterle W Jamison A O 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 143001
[9] Seebelberg F Buchheim N Lu Z K Schneider T Luo X Y Tiemann E Bloch I Gohle C 2018 Phys. Rev. 97 013405
[10] Yang H Zhang D C Liu L Liu Y X Nan J Zhao B Pan J W 2019 Science 363 261
[11] Chin C Grimm R Julienne P Tiesinga E 2010 Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 1225
[12] Giorgini S Pitaevskii L P Stringari S 2008 Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 1215
[13] Liang Z X Zhang Z D Liu W M 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 050402
[14] Ji A C Liu W M Song J L Zhou F 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 010402
[15] Kraemer T Mark M Waldburger P Danzl J G Chin C Engeser B Lange A D Pilch K Jaakkola A Nägerl H C Grimm R 2006 Nature 440 315
[16] Braaten E Hammer H W 2006 Phys. Rep. 428 259
[17] Park J W Wu C H Santiago I Tiecke T G Will S Ahmadi P Zwierlein M W 2012 Phys. Rev. 85 051602
[18] Zhu M J Yang H Liu L Zhang D C Liu Y X Nue J Rui J Zhao B Pan J W Tiemann E 2017 Phys. Rev. 96 062705
[19] Ishikawa K Kumauchi T Baba M Katô H 1992 J. Chem. Phys. 96 6423
[20] Park J W Will S A Zwierlein M W 2015 New J. Phys. 17 075016
[21] Liu L Zhang D C Yang H Liu Y X Nue J Rui J Zhao B Pan J W 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 253201
[22] Temelkov I Knöckel H Pashov A Tiemann E 2015 Phys. Rev. 91 032512
[23] Johnson B R 1978 J. Chem. Phys. 69 4678